From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef Weidendorfer Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:12:24 +0100 Message-ID: <200612230112.24212.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> References: <7vzm9g2rv5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200612221111.58071.andyparkins@gmail.com> <7vlkkzv6rq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andy Parkins , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 23 01:12:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxuVG-0007xB-CP for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:12:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753312AbWLWAMe (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:12:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753302AbWLWAMe (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:12:34 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47710 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753312AbWLWAMe (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:12:34 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2006 00:12:32 -0000 Received: from p5496B9D3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO noname) [84.150.185.211] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 23 Dec 2006 01:12:32 +0100 X-Authenticated: #352111 To: Junio C Hamano User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 In-Reply-To: <7vlkkzv6rq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Saturday 23 December 2006 00:40, you wrote: > Andy Parkins writes: > > > On Friday 2006 December 22 09:37, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> * jc/git-add--interactive (Mon Dec 11 17:09:26 2006 -0800) 2 commits > >> + git-add --interactive: hunk splitting > >> + git-add --interactive > > > > I used this to disentangle a load of changes that I made under pressure and > > turned them into lovely isolated commits. I didn't have any trouble with it, > > and thought it was incredibly useful. > > > > I'd vote for putting it in 1.5 - it's in keeping with the usability theme - > > people love interactive stuff. > > Seconds? Thirds? Vetoes? Seconds. I like it. Andy: Did you check whether your disentangled commits each actually did compile on their own? If yes, how did you do it? Josef