From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch sungem] improved locking Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:20:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20061229.152053.03108820.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1165982844.11914.125.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061228.210546.55150331.davem@davemloft.net> <1167428167.23340.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.lemoine@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51321 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752879AbWL2XVT (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:21:19 -0500 To: benh@kernel.crashing.org In-Reply-To: <1167428167.23340.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:36:07 +1100 > Heh, it's very possible it's a regression I added indeed. I'll try to > have a look next week. Do you know of anybody who can verify on non-mii > hardware or is pause irrelevant there ? For PCS based PHY's most of the logic is taken care of internally, and the pause-present signal is just sampled from one of the PCS registers. I think I have one here using non-mii that I could check at some point :)