From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932312AbXAAXWT (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:22:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932215AbXAAXWT (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:22:19 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:4405 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754724AbXAAXWS (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:22:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:28:03 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ollie Wild , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch] remove MAX_ARG_PAGES Message-ID: <20070101172803.GC4214@ucw.cz> References: <65dd6fd50610101705t3db93a72sc0847cd120aa05d3@mail.gmail.com> <1160572460.2006.79.camel@taijtu> <65dd6fd50610111448q7ff210e1nb5f14917c311c8d4@mail.gmail.com> <65dd6fd50610241048h24af39d9ob49c3816dfe1ca64@mail.gmail.com> <20061229200357.GA5940@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061229200357.GA5940@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to > 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great - > i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository - > something i havent been able to do for years ;-) > > what is keeping this fix from going upstream? +1 I like this. I've been running with MAX_ARG_PAGES raised to insane value, and I'd love to get rid of that hack. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:28:03 +0000 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [patch] remove MAX_ARG_PAGES Message-ID: <20070101172803.GC4214@ucw.cz> References: <65dd6fd50610101705t3db93a72sc0847cd120aa05d3@mail.gmail.com> <1160572460.2006.79.camel@taijtu> <65dd6fd50610111448q7ff210e1nb5f14917c311c8d4@mail.gmail.com> <65dd6fd50610241048h24af39d9ob49c3816dfe1ca64@mail.gmail.com> <20061229200357.GA5940@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061229200357.GA5940@elte.hu> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ollie Wild , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Peter Zijlstra List-ID: Hi! > FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to > 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great - > i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository - > something i havent been able to do for years ;-) > > what is keeping this fix from going upstream? +1 I like this. I've been running with MAX_ARG_PAGES raised to insane value, and I'd love to get rid of that hack. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org