From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: 32-on-64: pvfb issue Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:05:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20070118170503.GE5103@redhat.com> References: <45AF7CDD.6090709@suse.de> <87wt3kz8fg.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <45AF93A7.50107@suse.de> <20070118155352.GC5103@redhat.com> <45AFA178.7000206@suse.de> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45AFA178.7000206@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Xen devel list , Markus Armbruster List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:34:00PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Actually FC6 isn't a problem - the ABI already changed between the time we > > shipped it in FC6, and the time it got merged in xen-devel. > > Ok. > > > For RHEL-5 though > > we have synced to the ABI currently in xen-devel/xen-3.0.4. > > Hmm, assuming we'll fix up the ABI now to be binary compatible between > 32 and 64 bit and put that one into both 3.0.4 and unstable, could that > still make it into RHEL-5 or is that too late now? Not any chance whatsoever I'm afraid :-( We're way too far into the release process to make any functional changes now. Regards, Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|