All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@osdl.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: adobriyan@openvz.org, ak@suse.de, davej@codemonkey.org.uk
Subject: + rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:40:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702012140.l11LePa4023647@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)


The patch titled
     rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@openvz.org>

There was OpenVZ specific bug rendering some cpufreq drivers unusable on SMP. 
In short, when cpufreq code thinks it confined itself to needed cpu by means
of set_cpus_allowed() to execute rdmsr, some "virtual cpu" feature can migrate
process to anywhere.  This triggers bugons and does wrong things in general.

This got fixed by introducing rdmsr_on_cpu and wrmsr_on_cpu executing rdmsr
and wrmsr on given physical cpu by means of smp_call_function_single().

Dave Jones mentioned cpufreq might be not only user of rdmsr_on_cpu() and
wrmsr_on_cpu(), so I'm putting them into arch/{i386,x86_64}/lib/ .

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@openvz.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---

 arch/i386/lib/Makefile       |    2 
 arch/i386/lib/msr-on-cpu.c   |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile     |    2 
 arch/x86_64/lib/msr-on-cpu.c |    1 
 include/asm-i386/msr.h       |    3 +
 include/asm-x86_64/msr.h     |    2 
 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN arch/i386/lib/Makefile~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu arch/i386/lib/Makefile
--- a/arch/i386/lib/Makefile~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu
+++ a/arch/i386/lib/Makefile
@@ -7,3 +7,5 @@ lib-y = checksum.o delay.o usercopy.o ge
 	bitops.o semaphore.o
 
 lib-$(CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW) += mmx.o
+
+obj-y = msr-on-cpu.o
diff -puN /dev/null arch/i386/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
--- /dev/null
+++ a/arch/i386/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+struct msr_info {
+	u32 msr_no;
+	u32 l, h;
+};
+
+static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+	struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+	rdmsr(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
+}
+
+void rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+	preempt_disable();
+	if (smp_processor_id() == cpu)
+		rdmsr(msr_no, *l, *h);
+	else {
+		struct msr_info rv;
+
+		rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 0, 1);
+		*l = rv.l;
+		*h = rv.h;
+	}
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+	struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+	wrmsr(rv->msr_no, rv->l, rv->h);
+}
+
+void wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+	preempt_disable();
+	if (smp_processor_id() == cpu)
+		wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
+	else {
+		struct msr_info rv;
+
+		rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+		rv.l = l;
+		rv.h = h;
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 0, 1);
+	}
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+#else
+void rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+	rdmsr(msr_no, *l, *h);
+}
+
+void wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+	wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
+}
+#endif
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
diff -puN arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile
--- a/arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu
+++ a/arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 CFLAGS_csum-partial.o := -funroll-loops
 
-obj-y := io.o iomap_copy.o
+obj-y := io.o iomap_copy.o msr-on-cpu.o
 
 lib-y := csum-partial.o csum-copy.o csum-wrappers.o delay.o \
 	usercopy.o getuser.o putuser.o  \
diff -puN /dev/null arch/x86_64/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
--- /dev/null
+++ a/arch/x86_64/lib/msr-on-cpu.c
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+#include "../../i386/lib/msr-on-cpu.c"
diff -puN include/asm-i386/msr.h~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu include/asm-i386/msr.h
--- a/include/asm-i386/msr.h~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu
+++ a/include/asm-i386/msr.h
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ static inline void wrmsrl (unsigned long
 			  : "c" (counter))
 #endif	/* !CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
 
+void rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
+void wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
+
 /* symbolic names for some interesting MSRs */
 /* Intel defined MSRs. */
 #define MSR_IA32_P5_MC_ADDR		0
diff -puN include/asm-x86_64/msr.h~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu include/asm-x86_64/msr.h
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h~rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu
+++ a/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h
@@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ static inline unsigned int cpuid_edx(uns
 #define MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE		0x79
 #define MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV		0x8b
 
+void rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
+void wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
 
 #endif
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from adobriyan@openvz.org are

revert-x86_64-mm-msr-on-cpu.patch
rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch
p4-clockmod-use-rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch
sysctl_ms_jiffies-fix-oldlen-semantics.patch
consolidate-default-sched_clock.patch
fix-rmmod-read-write-races-in-proc-entries.patch
sn2-use-static-proc_fops.patch
consolidate-bust_spinlocks.patch
extract-and-use-wake_up_klogd.patch
lutimesat-simplify-utime2.patch
lutimesat-extend-do_utimes-with-flags.patch
lutimesat-actual-syscall-and-wire-up-on-i386.patch

             reply	other threads:[~2007-02-01 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-01 21:40 akpm [this message]
2007-02-09  1:04 + rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch added to -mm tree akpm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702012140.l11LePa4023647@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@openvz.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.