From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:40:07 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] building ARM toolchain with nofpu In-Reply-To: <200702081833.53780.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> References: <200702072124.30009.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <20070208172531.GB8945@aon.at> <200702081833.53780.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> Message-ID: <20070208174007.GA9196@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:33:53PM +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: >Bernhard, >All, > >On Thursday 08 February 2007 182, Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> It would be of tremendous help to have one non-float mmu-less config for >> a kernel that i can check against qemu (i.e. run the resulting >> filesystem and kernel via current qemu). >> Does anybody have such a .config i could play with? > >I'm using a highly modified, soon-to-be-available version of crosstool to >build my toolchains, not buildroot (except for vampirising its patches! :-) ). > >I can try with buildroot, and submit a patch if I succeed. More later (I'm >kind of busy right now with a BluePAD tablet PC and my crosstool). > >The problem lies more with gcc than with uClibc or binutils or the kernel >headers. I was talking about a kernel .config and a hint on what arm variant qemu supports (nick-name plus cpu name like "dominator" arm0815xyz).