From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH]indistinguishable devices with broken and unbroken firmware #2 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:20:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20070209012053.GE2685@suse.de> References: <200702080904.48806.oneukum@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43483 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945988AbXBIBWF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:22:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702080904.48806.oneukum@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Neukum Cc: usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Alan Stern On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:04:48AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > there's a USB mass storage device which exists in two version. One > reports the correct size and the other does not. Apart from that they > are identical and cannot be told apart. Here's a heuristic based on the > empirical finding that drives have even sizes. > > The requested changes have been made. > Greg, can this go through your tree? If the usb-storage people ACK it, I'll be glad to add it to my trees. thanks, greg k-h