From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751665AbXBJN4M (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:56:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751667AbXBJN4M (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:56:12 -0500 Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.137]:25420 "EHLO mtagate4.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbXBJN4L (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:56:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:56:09 +0200 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge Message-ID: <20070210135609.GC18296@rhun.ibm.com> References: <200702101242.48467.ak@suse.de> <20070210134348.GB18296@rhun.ibm.com> <200702101452.16472.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702101452.16472.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Saturday 10 February 2007 14:43, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:42:48PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > I will post the existing patches in batches for closer review. > > > > > > Can be already all viewed at > > > ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/ > > > > Andi, please make sure to also include this Calgary patch I sent on > > Feb 6th. > > It's already included > > > ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/robustify-bad_dma_address-handling Thanks, I scanned the list for 'calgary' and missed it. I'm guessing the Calgary got dropped because the Subject had 'x86-64 Calgary:' and your scripts trimmed the prefix? Cheers, Muli