All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* current git breaks resume
@ 2007-02-09 19:03 Jens Axboe
  2007-02-10  9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2007-02-11  5:02 ` Len Brown
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-09 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,

Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
then.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-09 19:03 current git breaks resume Jens Axboe
@ 2007-02-10  9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2007-02-10 11:24   ` Jens Axboe
  2007-02-11  5:02 ` Len Brown
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2007-02-10  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi,

On Friday, 9 February 2007 20:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> then.

I think the patch from

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=117103448629685&w=2

is likely to help.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
If you don't have the time to read,
you don't have the time or the tools to write.
		- Stephen King

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-10  9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2007-02-10 11:24   ` Jens Axboe
  2007-02-10 11:50     ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-10 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Friday, 9 February 2007 20:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> > but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> > want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> > as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> > doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> > then.
> 
> I think the patch from
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=117103448629685&w=2
> 
> is likely to help.

Thanks, will give it a shot.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-10 11:24   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2007-02-10 11:50     ` Jens Axboe
  2007-02-10 11:57       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-10 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Friday, 9 February 2007 20:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> > > but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> > > want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> > > as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> > > doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> > > then.
> > 
> > I think the patch from
> > 
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=117103448629685&w=2
> > 
> > is likely to help.
> 
> Thanks, will give it a shot.

Doesn't work, still hangs in the same way.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-10 11:50     ` Jens Axboe
@ 2007-02-10 11:57       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2007-02-11  3:28         ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2007-02-10 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Saturday, 10 February 2007 12:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Friday, 9 February 2007 20:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> > > > but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> > > > want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> > > > as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> > > > doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> > > > then.
> > > 
> > > I think the patch from
> > > 
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=117103448629685&w=2
> > > 
> > > is likely to help.
> > 
> > Thanks, will give it a shot.
> 
> Doesn't work, still hangs in the same way.

Well, looked promising ...

Still, I suspect the ACPI changes cause the problem to happen.

I've tested 2.6.20-git4 and it works on  my box (HPC nx6325, x86_64).
Unfortunately I have no i386 setup anywhere close to me right now.

Greetings,
Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-10 11:57       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2007-02-11  3:28         ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-11  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 February 2007 12:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 10 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Friday, 9 February 2007 20:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> > > > > but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> > > > > want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> > > > > as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> > > > > doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> > > > > then.
> > > > 
> > > > I think the patch from
> > > > 
> > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=117103448629685&w=2
> > > > 
> > > > is likely to help.
> > > 
> > > Thanks, will give it a shot.
> > 
> > Doesn't work, still hangs in the same way.
> 
> Well, looked promising ...
> 
> Still, I suspect the ACPI changes cause the problem to happen.
> 
> I've tested 2.6.20-git4 and it works on  my box (HPC nx6325, x86_64).
> Unfortunately I have no i386 setup anywhere close to me right now.

When I'm on stable ground again, I'll try with pm tracing and see if
that yields anything. Otherwise I'll do a bisect.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-09 19:03 current git breaks resume Jens Axboe
  2007-02-10  9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2007-02-11  5:02 ` Len Brown
  2007-02-11 14:34   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
  2007-02-11 16:53   ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2007-02-11  5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, linux-acpi; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Friday 09 February 2007 14:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> then.

resume from RAM, or resume from disk?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-11  5:02 ` Len Brown
@ 2007-02-11 14:34   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
  2007-02-11 16:53   ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Starikovskiy @ 2007-02-11 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Len Brown; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-acpi, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 677 bytes --]

Len Brown wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 14:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
>> but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
>> want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
>> as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
>> doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
>> then.
>>     
>
> resume from RAM, or resume from disk?
>
>   
Len,
resume from RAM is still broken by "Disable all wakeup GPEs". My 
previous patch for T43 does not help, only attached one helps (revert 
original patch).

[-- Attachment #2: fix-disable_all_wake_gpes.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1049 bytes --]

Disable wake GPEs only once.

From: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>


---

 drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c |   11 -----------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c b/drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c
index dfac3ec..635ba44 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c
@@ -636,17 +636,6 @@ acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(struct acpi_gpe_eve
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!acpi_gbl_system_awake_and_running) {
-		/*
-		 * We just woke up because of a wake GPE. Disable any further GPEs
-		 * until we are fully up and running (Only wake GPEs should be enabled
-		 * at this time, but we just brute-force disable them all.)
-		 * 1) We must disable this particular wake GPE so it won't fire again
-		 * 2) We want to disable all wake GPEs, since we are now awake
-		 */
-		(void)acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes();
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Dispatch the GPE to either an installed handler, or the control method
 	 * associated with this GPE (_Lxx or _Exx). If a handler exists, we invoke

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-11  5:02 ` Len Brown
  2007-02-11 14:34   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
@ 2007-02-11 16:53   ` Jens Axboe
  2007-02-11 17:31     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-11 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Len Brown; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel

On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 14:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> > but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> > want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> > as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> > doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> > then.
> 
> resume from RAM, or resume from disk?

Resume from RAM, I never use suspend-to-disk.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-11 16:53   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2007-02-11 17:31     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
  2007-02-11 17:36       ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Starikovskiy @ 2007-02-11 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Len Brown wrote:
>   
>> On Friday 09 February 2007 14:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
>>> but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
>>> want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
>>> as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
>>> doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
>>> then.
>>>       
>> resume from RAM, or resume from disk?
>>     
>
> Resume from RAM, I never use suspend-to-disk.
>
>   
Jens,
Could you please test the patch I've sent?

Thanks,
    Alex.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-11 17:31     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
@ 2007-02-11 17:36       ` Jens Axboe
  2007-02-11 17:56         ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-11 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Starikovskiy; +Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel

On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> >  
> >>On Friday 09 February 2007 14:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>    
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> >>>but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> >>>want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> >>>as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> >>>doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> >>>then.
> >>>      
> >>resume from RAM, or resume from disk?
> >>    
> >
> >Resume from RAM, I never use suspend-to-disk.
> >
> >  
> Jens,
> Could you please test the patch I've sent?

Just saw it, will do.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: current git breaks resume
  2007-02-11 17:36       ` Jens Axboe
@ 2007-02-11 17:56         ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2007-02-11 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Starikovskiy; +Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel

On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >On Sun, Feb 11 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> > >  
> > >>On Friday 09 February 2007 14:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>    
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>Unfortunately I'm a little short on time as I'll be travelling tomorrow,
> > >>>but of course preparing a new kernel for the laptop is something you
> > >>>want to do right before leaving. So I discovered that the current (well
> > >>>as of yesterday, HEAD is 5986a2ec35836a878350c54af4bd91b1de6abc59)
> > >>>doesn't resume on my x60. 2.6.20 works fine, so something broke since
> > >>>then.
> > >>>      
> > >>resume from RAM, or resume from disk?
> > >>    
> > >
> > >Resume from RAM, I never use suspend-to-disk.
> > >
> > >  
> > Jens,
> > Could you please test the patch I've sent?
> 
> Just saw it, will do.

With that patch applied, current git works as expected. Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-11 17:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-09 19:03 current git breaks resume Jens Axboe
2007-02-10  9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-10 11:24   ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-10 11:50     ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-10 11:57       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11  3:28         ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-11  5:02 ` Len Brown
2007-02-11 14:34   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-02-11 16:53   ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-11 17:31     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-02-11 17:36       ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-11 17:56         ` Jens Axboe

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.