From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: acpi_find_bmc() and acpi_get_table() Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:28:07 -0500 Message-ID: <200702110028.08052.lenb@kernel.org> References: <200702102327.28312.lenb@kernel.org> <45CEA157.8050207@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:36827 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743AbXBKF3f (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:29:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45CEA157.8050207@acm.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Corey Minyard Cc: minyard@mvista.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 10 February 2007 23:53, Corey Minyard wrote: > ...the IPMI spec states that in the case > of multiple interfaces, a unique SPMI table should be provided for each > of those interfaces. So the IPMI spec seems to require support more > than one. okay, good to know. If you have the dmesg or acpidump output from a box with multiple interfaces, we should then see multiple SPMI entries in the RSDT. thanks, -Len