From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Tomasz Chilinski" <chilek@chilan.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:48:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Is ESFQ working?
Message-Id: <20070211154721.M41804@chilan.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <200702111301.51685.alejandro_aero@yahoo.es>
In-Reply-To: <200702111301.51685.alejandro_aero@yahoo.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:19:54 +0100, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote
> > >
> > > [cut]
> >
> > Have u tried to replace CLASSIFY target by MARK target and then using
> > fw filter? I have got bad experience with CLASSIFY target.
> >
> 
> Behaviour is identical if i use classify or mark, however, i 
> expected this, because the packets do go to the right classes, it's 
> just it looks that ESFQ is not assuring fairness between users

Which version of ESFQ? Patch for 2.6.15.1 or 2.6.19.2?

Bests, Tomasz Chilinski.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc