From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933027AbXBLGNz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:13:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933025AbXBLGNz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:13:55 -0500 Received: from paragon.brong.net ([66.232.154.163]:37904 "EHLO paragon.brong.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933027AbXBLGNy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:13:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:13:47 +1100 From: Bron Gondwana To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.40 Message-ID: <20070212061347.GB24889@brong.net> References: <20070210164113.GG12958@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070210164113.GG12958@stusta.de> Organization: brong.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > New drivers since 2.6.16.39: > - Areca ARC11X0/ARC12X0 SATA-RAID support > - AMD Athlon64/FX and Opteron temperature sensor Sorry - I think I just sent a blank reply to this! Oops. I was going to say - thanks. We'll definitely be using this kernel since we've found that 2.6.19.2 has a significantly worse IO profile and either the 2.6.16.40-rc1 kernel or 2.6.18 on otherwise identical machines with pretty stable loads (so we can compare back to previous weeks). Now to figure out what's causing the extra load in the 2.6.19 branch! Bron.