All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
	patches@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH x86 for review II] [2/39] x86_64: Break init() in two parts to avoid MODPOST warnings
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:37:48 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070212073748.1FF6013D01@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070212837.963446000@suse.de>


From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>

o init() is a non __init function in .text section but it calls many
  functions which are in .init.text section. Hence MODPOST generates lots
  of cross reference warnings on i386 if compiled with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y

WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:smp_prepare_cpus from .text between 'init' (at offset 0xc0101049) and 'rest_init'
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:migration_init from .text between 'init' (at offset 0xc010104e) and 'rest_init'
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:spawn_ksoftirqd from .text between 'init' (at offset 0xc0101053) and 'rest_init'

o This patch breaks down init() in two parts. One part which can go
  in .init.text section and can be freed and other part which has to
  be non __init(init_post()). Now init() calls init_post() and init_post()
  does not call any functions present in .init sections. Hence getting
  rid of warnings.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

---

 init/main.c |   81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Index: linux/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux/init/main.c
@@ -713,7 +713,49 @@ static void run_init_process(char *init_
 	kernel_execve(init_filename, argv_init, envp_init);
 }
 
-static int init(void * unused)
+/* This is a non __init function. Force it to be noinline otherwise gcc
+ * makes it inline to init() and it becomes part of init.text section
+ */
+static int noinline init_post(void)
+{
+	free_initmem();
+	unlock_kernel();
+	mark_rodata_ro();
+	system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
+	numa_default_policy();
+
+	if (sys_open((const char __user *) "/dev/console", O_RDWR, 0) < 0)
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: unable to open an initial console.\n");
+
+	(void) sys_dup(0);
+	(void) sys_dup(0);
+
+	if (ramdisk_execute_command) {
+		run_init_process(ramdisk_execute_command);
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to execute %s\n",
+				ramdisk_execute_command);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We try each of these until one succeeds.
+	 *
+	 * The Bourne shell can be used instead of init if we are
+	 * trying to recover a really broken machine.
+	 */
+	if (execute_command) {
+		run_init_process(execute_command);
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to execute %s.  Attempting "
+					"defaults...\n", execute_command);
+	}
+	run_init_process("/sbin/init");
+	run_init_process("/etc/init");
+	run_init_process("/bin/init");
+	run_init_process("/bin/sh");
+
+	panic("No init found.  Try passing init= option to kernel.");
+}
+
+static int __init init(void * unused)
 {
 	lock_kernel();
 	/*
@@ -761,39 +803,6 @@ static int init(void * unused)
 	 * we're essentially up and running. Get rid of the
 	 * initmem segments and start the user-mode stuff..
 	 */
-	free_initmem();
-	unlock_kernel();
-	mark_rodata_ro();
-	system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
-	numa_default_policy();
-
-	if (sys_open((const char __user *) "/dev/console", O_RDWR, 0) < 0)
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: unable to open an initial console.\n");
-
-	(void) sys_dup(0);
-	(void) sys_dup(0);
-
-	if (ramdisk_execute_command) {
-		run_init_process(ramdisk_execute_command);
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to execute %s\n",
-				ramdisk_execute_command);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We try each of these until one succeeds.
-	 *
-	 * The Bourne shell can be used instead of init if we are 
-	 * trying to recover a really broken machine.
-	 */
-	if (execute_command) {
-		run_init_process(execute_command);
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to execute %s.  Attempting "
-					"defaults...\n", execute_command);
-	}
-	run_init_process("/sbin/init");
-	run_init_process("/etc/init");
-	run_init_process("/bin/init");
-	run_init_process("/bin/sh");
-
-	panic("No init found.  Try passing init= option to kernel.");
+	init_post();
+	return 0;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-12  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-12  7:37 [PATCH x86 for review II] [1/39] i386: move startup_32() in text.head section Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [3/39] i386: arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c should #include <asm/mce.h> Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [4/39] i386: add idle notifier Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [5/39] i386: improve sched_clock() on i686 Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [6/39] i386: romsignature/checksum cleanup Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [7/39] x86_64: Fix fake numa for x86_64 machines with big IO hole Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [8/39] x86_64: Remove fastcall references in x86_64 code Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [9/39] x86_64: Use constant instead of raw number in x86_64 ioperm.c Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [10/39] x86_64: Handle 32 bit PerfMon Counter writes cleanly in x86_64 nmi_watchdog Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [11/39] i386: Handle 32 bit PerfMon Counter writes cleanly in i386 nmi_watchdog Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:37 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [12/39] i386: Handle 32 bit PerfMon Counter writes cleanly in oprofile Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [13/39] i386: CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN limited to 4M? Andi Kleen
2007-02-13  6:36   ` Rene Herman
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [14/39] x86_64: cleanup Doc/x86_64/ files Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [15/39] x86_64: list x86_64 quilt tree Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [16/39] x86: simplify notify_page_fault() Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [17/39] x86_64: Tighten mce_amd driver MSR reads Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [18/39] x86_64: Allow to run a program when a machine check event is detected Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:54   ` Oliver Neukum
2007-02-12  8:04     ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  8:11       ` Bauke Jan Douma
2007-02-12 15:05       ` [patches] " Pavel Machek
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [19/39] x86_64: remove get_pmd() Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [20/39] i386: Small cleanup to TLB flush code Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [21/39] i386: rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [22/39] x86_64: Kconfig typos Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [23/39] i386: use smp_call_function_single() Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [24/39] " Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [25/39] x86_64: Fix preprocessor condition Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [26/39] i386: fix 32-bit ioctls on x64_32 Andi Kleen
2007-02-12 13:24   ` Giuliano Procida
2007-02-12 22:28     ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [27/39] i386: APM on i386 Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [28/39] i386: fix size_or_mask and size_and_mask Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [29/39] x86_64: - Ignore long SMI interrupts in clock calibration code - update 1 Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [30/39] x86_64: Check return value of putreg in PTRACE_SETREGS Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [31/39] x86_64: Unexport __supported_pte_mask Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [32/39] x86_64: x86_64 - Fix FS/GS registers for VT execution Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [33/39] x86_64: Fix off by one error in IOMMU boundary checking Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [34/39] i386: Use stack arguments for calling into EFI Andi Kleen
2007-02-12 19:45   ` Frédéric RISS
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [35/39] x86_64: Don't reserve ROMs Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [36/39] x86_64: define dma noncoherent API functions Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [37/39] x86_64: robustify bad_dma_address handling Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [38/39] x86: fix laptop bootup hang in init_acpi() Andi Kleen
2007-02-12  7:38 ` [PATCH x86 for review II] [39/39] i386: All Transmeta CPUs have constant TSCs Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070212073748.1FF6013D01@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@x86-64.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.