From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hjk@linutronix.de (=?iso-8859-1?q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Koch?=) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:48:05 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] Add MAX6650 support Message-Id: <200702121448.06283.hjk@linutronix.de> List-Id: References: <200701171359.46334.hjk@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <200701171359.46334.hjk@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Am Sonntag, 11. Februar 2007 17:22 schrieb Hans-J?rgen Koch: > Am Sonntag 11 Februar 2007 16:44 schrieb corentin.labbe: > > Hello > > > > i saw some problems in your code: > > > > On line 141 you excess the 80 characters width > > + static ssize_t get_fan(struct device *dev, struct > > device_attribute *devattr, char *buf, int nr) > > > > > > On the comment you have written "MAX6650 also" instead of "MAX6551 > > also" * This module has only been tested with the MAX6650 chip. It > > should * work with the MAX6650 also, though with reduced > > functionality. It * does not distinguish max6650 and max6651 chips. > > > > > > You must use dev_dbg instead of #ifdef debug > > > > > > On line 535 the while(0) is useless > > erase the max6650_init_client function > > +static void max6650_init_client(struct i2c_client *client) > > +{ > > + /* Nothing to do here - assume the BIOS has initialized the chip > > */ + while(0) > > + { > > + ; > > + } > > +} > > > > > > Don't use down() up() > > replace with mutex > > > > On line 553 > > MAX6650_REG_TACH0, MAX6650_REG_TACH1, > > MAX6650_REG_TACH2, MAX6650_REG_TACH3 > > one per line > > "," at the end > > like > > static const u8 tach_reg[] > > { > > MAX6650_REG_TACH0, > > MAX6650_REG_TACH1, > > MAX6650_REG_TACH2, > > MAX6650_REG_TACH3, > > }; > > > > > > Why use max6650_read_value and max6650_write_value? > > replace with i2c_smbus_write_byte_data and i2c_smbus_read_byte_data > > directly > > > > Check error return code of i2c_detach_client(client); > > like > > if ((err = i2c_detach_client(client))) > > return err; > > > > > > Don't use many device_create_file > > use sysfs_create_group > > Thanks for your review, I'll look at the code again and post an > updated patch soon. > Hi, here's the promised patch with these issues hopefully solved. I tested the module on a Kontron CPX board, with a vanilla 2.6.20 kernel, it seems to work fine. Thanks again for the review, Hans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: max6650.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 18702 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20070212/7ca36436/attachment.bin