From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:36:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702122036.52456.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008501c74ed5$8f09c050$1f00d3c1@atmel.com>
On Monday 12 February 2007 19:40, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > Yeah, that's a nice attitude. "Go away, we don't want your patches."
> > Without even looking at them?
>
> I dont want patches that stops U-boot from functioning, that is correct.
> If someone creates a patch which will improve functionality,
> tries it out on a reasonable number of targets and then it
> later turns out that there are some problems in corner cases,
> I will not call for a public hanging.
Sometimes you have to make some changes without being able to really test them
on real hardware. That's definitely nothing we like to do, but sometimes
there is no other way. Or we would keep "status quo" and I think we all agree
that we want to keep this project moving, even with more pace than in the
last months.
> > Btw, I can't help but feel that you're using me as an example here,
> > since I _did_ at one point suggest that one particular patch would
> > only need compile-testing. If you are, please stop it because you're
> > misrepresenting what I said.
>
> No, I was thinking of the guys that wants to change the complete
> support for dataflash with no intention to test it on any
> board with dataflash
That sounds a little like he (Grant) really wanted to _break_ dataflash
support intentionally. His idea was to clean up some ugly places and replace
them with something more readable and maintainable (Grant, please jump in if
I misinterpret you here). If he is unable to test the results (compile clean
is of course mandatory) then other have to "jump in" here. IIRC, he
volunteered to clean up possible bugs too.
So please don't discourage people who want to improve this project. Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-12 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.12584.1171099992.16820.u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
2007-02-10 20:31 ` [U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK Ivan Kuten
2007-02-11 16:43 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 18:04 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-11 19:42 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 20:23 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-11 20:29 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 20:54 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-11 21:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-11 21:39 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 23:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-12 0:26 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-12 15:18 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-12 18:40 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-12 19:36 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2007-02-12 19:37 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-12 20:05 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 21:54 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 11:49 Michel Benoit
2007-02-11 16:20 ` Ulf Samuelsson
[not found] <mailman.5069.1170973304.16820.u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
2007-02-08 22:57 ` Ivan Kuten
[not found] <c88e466f0702050752t16c18251gcddf40a7ec95469@mail.gmail.com>
2007-02-07 23:17 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-08 6:06 ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-08 8:34 ` Michel Benoit
2007-02-08 19:25 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-08 20:58 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-08 22:20 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 15:45 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-09 19:11 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 19:54 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-09 19:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-09 22:18 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 22:58 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-09 23:20 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 23:42 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-10 0:10 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-10 1:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-10 9:05 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-10 7:23 ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-10 1:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-10 7:32 ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-10 9:29 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-10 1:53 ` Ken Watson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702122036.52456.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.