All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:24:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702130024.20876.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702130008.47684.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Tuesday 13 February 2007 00:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote:
> > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >>> It doesn't help in my case.  The behavior is similar to that without the patch,
> > >>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely.
> > >> Thanks for trying.
> > >>
> > >> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 to 200.
> > > 
> > > Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume ...
> > 
> > Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to respond.
> > 
> > > I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware.  Where exactly is it
> > > stored?
> > 
> > In the memory of the microprocessor on the card.
> > 
> > Please do what I asked.
> 
> With or without the previous patch?

Both, please.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-12 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-09 16:18 Larry Finger
2007-02-09 16:18 ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 16:53 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 16:53   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-10 17:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-10 17:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-10 20:33     ` Larry Finger
2007-02-11 12:56       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 13:07         ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-11 14:02           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 14:14             ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-11 14:41               ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-11 14:45                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 14:48                   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-11 15:59               ` Larry Finger
2007-02-11 16:03                 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-11 16:16                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-11 16:17                   ` Larry Finger
2007-02-12  0:50                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12  1:18                   ` Larry Finger
2007-02-12 20:48                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12 22:20                       ` Larry Finger
2007-02-12 23:08                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12 23:18                           ` Larry Finger
2007-02-12 23:24                           ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-02-13 16:25                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702130024.20876.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.