From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:50594 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030484AbXBLXYl (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:24:41 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:24:20 +0100 Cc: Larry Finger , wireless , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, John Linville References: <45cc9ebb.+9O/IXvs/C9RyFnk%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <45D0E834.4050800@lwfinger.net> <200702130008.47684.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200702130008.47684.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200702130024.20876.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 13 February 2007 00:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote: > > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >>> It doesn't help in my case. The behavior is similar to that without the patch, > > >>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely. > > >> Thanks for trying. > > >> > > >> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 to 200. > > > > > > Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume ... > > > > Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to respond. > > > > > I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware. Where exactly is it > > > stored? > > > > In the memory of the microprocessor on the card. > > > > Please do what I asked. > > With or without the previous patch? Both, please. -- Greetings Michael.