From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Li Subject: Re: Bogus sparse warning? Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:46:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20070213014657.GA2922@chrisli.org> References: <780B1941-729E-47CB-9716-578AD8D25302@cam.ac.uk> <20070212191434.GA1041@chrisli.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([216.148.227.153]:55084 "EHLO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933132AbXBMCQR (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:16:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:15:56AM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > I applied this patch to the current spares git code and reran my test and > now we have two warnings: > > CHECK fs/ntfs/file.c > fs/ntfs/file.c:2241:5: warning: incorrect type in argument 8 (different > signedness) > fs/ntfs/file.c:2241:5: expected int [signed] ( [signed] [usertype] > get_block )( ... ) > fs/ntfs/file.c:2241:5: got int [signed] ( static [toplevel] * > )( ... ) > include/linux/fs.h:1791:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 8 > (different signedness) > include/linux/fs.h:1791:14: expected int [signed] ( [signed] [usertype] > get_block )( ... ) > include/linux/fs.h:1791:14: got int [signed] ( *get_block )( ... ) > > Best regards, > I see. In evaluate_call(). evaluate_arguments() is called before target function arguments are converted into pointers. Can you please try this patch instead? Chris Index: sparse/symbol.h =================================================================== --- sparse.orig/symbol.h 2007-02-12 18:10:01.000000000 -0800 +++ sparse/symbol.h 2007-02-12 18:10:06.000000000 -0800 @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct symbol { #define MOD_SIZE (MOD_CHAR | MOD_SHORT | MOD_LONG | MOD_LONGLONG) #define MOD_IGNORE (MOD_TOPLEVEL | MOD_STORAGE | MOD_ADDRESSABLE | \ MOD_ASSIGNED | MOD_USERTYPE | MOD_FORCE | MOD_ACCESSED | MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED) +#define MOD_PTRINHERIT (MOD_VOLATILE | MOD_CONST | MOD_NODEREF | MOD_STORAGE) /* Current parsing/evaluation function */ Index: sparse/evaluate.c =================================================================== --- sparse.orig/evaluate.c 2007-02-12 18:10:01.000000000 -0800 +++ sparse/evaluate.c 2007-02-12 18:10:48.000000000 -0800 @@ -1282,11 +1282,11 @@ static void examine_fn_arguments(struct else ptr->ctype.base_type = arg; ptr->ctype.as |= s->ctype.as; - ptr->ctype.modifiers |= s->ctype.modifiers; + ptr->ctype.modifiers |= s->ctype.modifiers & MOD_PTRINHERIT; s->ctype.base_type = ptr; s->ctype.as = 0; - s->ctype.modifiers = 0; + s->ctype.modifiers &= ~MOD_PTRINHERIT; s->bit_size = 0; s->examined = 0; examine_symbol_type(s); @@ -1313,8 +1313,6 @@ static struct symbol *convert_to_as_mod( return sym; } -#define MOD_PTRINHERIT (MOD_VOLATILE | MOD_CONST | MOD_NODEREF | MOD_STORAGE) - static struct symbol *create_pointer(struct expression *expr, struct symbol *sym, int degenerate) { struct symbol *node = alloc_symbol(expr->pos, SYM_NODE); @@ -2309,7 +2307,6 @@ static int evaluate_symbol_call(struct e int ret; struct symbol *curr = current_fn; current_fn = ctype->ctype.base_type; - examine_fn_arguments(current_fn); ret = inline_function(expr, ctype); @@ -2336,6 +2333,7 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_call(stru if (ctype->type == SYM_PTR || ctype->type == SYM_ARRAY) ctype = get_base_type(ctype); + examine_fn_arguments(ctype); if (sym->type == SYM_NODE && fn->type == EXPR_PREOP && sym->op && sym->op->args) { if (!sym->op->args(expr))