From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: linux-2.6.git/packed-refs??? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20070213181610.GA2782@thunk.org> References: <7v7ium1k7s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 13 19:16:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HH2CV-00056k-Df for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:16:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751429AbXBMSQU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751445AbXBMSQU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:20 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:60244 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751429AbXBMSQT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:19 -0500 Received: from root (helo=candygram.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtps (tls_cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1HH2HZ-0002OX-Ul; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:21:38 -0500 Received: from tytso by candygram.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HH2CJ-0000uR-0I; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v7ium1k7s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 01:27:03AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I noticed while scanning #git log that it appears that pack-refs > was run in your public repo and some people cannot clone over > dumb protocols with older git. > > commit 2986c02217f98809d8990e7679edf0f5d99f904d > Author: Junio C Hamano > Date: Wed Nov 22 22:24:09 2006 -0800 > > git-fetch: fix dumb protocol transport to fetch from pack-pruned ref > > was the first revision that aligned dumb protocol clients with > pack-ref; unfortunately anything older will not find the ref > that was packed. Stupid question. Suppose someone has run git pack-refs on a repository. What is the recommended way to reverse the process. Is the answer is to clone the repository and then throw away the original one? Is there another way to do it? - Ted