From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:34665 "EHLO mail.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030682AbXBOTJc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:09:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:09:30 +0100 From: Jiri Benc To: Johannes Berg Cc: Ivo van Doorn , John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] d80211: Add software sequence support Message-ID: <20070215200930.56c43974@griffin.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <1171557724.5220.30.camel@johannes.berg> References: <200702141423.27823.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1171557724.5220.30.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:42:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > Can this be a library function instead? Our TX path is already cluttered > enough... The advantage of non-library approach in this case is that you don't need to search for a BSS the frame belongs to. Ivo's patch searches for it but I think it's possible to remember it from the past. If this feature is implemented as a library function you need to search for a BSS in any case. That's way more overhead than one condition in the tx path. Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs