All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: IPW2200 monitoring FW broken
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:57:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702152057.11195.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45D4A175.8060207@linux.intel.com>

On Thursday 15 February 2007 19:07, James Ketrenos wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:43, James Ketrenos wrote:
> >> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 15 February 2007 17:35, James Ketrenos wrote:
> >>>> you can't update the packet capture  
> >>>> window or you'll lose packets; but you should be able to get them all if 
> >>>> you're doing a tethereal > somefile or if you turn off the update of the 
> >>>> main window.
> >>> "update of the packet capture window". What's that?
> >>> I started a simple traffic monitoring in wireshark. Nothing fancy.
> >> In the 'Capture Options', the only option you can set is 'Hide capture 
> >> info dialog'.  If you turn on 'Update list of packets in real time' or 
> >> 'Automatic scrolling in live capture', packets get dropped.  I don't 
> >> know if its a libpcap queue that fills up, if it starves the NIC, or 
> >> what--but having those turned on greatly reduces the # of packets you'll 
> >> capture.
> > 
> > Hm, yeah. I have that turned on. But I don't see this issue
> > when monitoring with bcm43xx hardware.
> > 
> 
> I had read about it on a libpcap forum a while ago (it wasn't an ipw2x00 
> issue that was being discussed); I never looked into the root cause of 
> it since I figured it was 'just the way it was'.
> 
> If you turn it off, does the # of packets captured improve w/ the ipw2200?

No. packet (beacon) sequence numbers from my AP are:
201, 202, 204, 205, 206, 209...
Just as an example.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-15 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-15 17:40 IPW2200 monitoring FW broken Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 16:35 ` James Ketrenos
2007-02-15 18:10   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 17:43     ` James Ketrenos
2007-02-15 19:20       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 18:07         ` James Ketrenos
2007-02-15 19:57           ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-02-16  9:26   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-18  3:41 ` Daniel Drake
2007-02-18 11:27   ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702152057.11195.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.