From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1J3JAod031865 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:19:10 -0500 Received: from mail.atsec.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l1J3KQBV000691 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 03:20:26 GMT Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:19:51 -0600 From: Klaus Weidner To: "Christopher J. PeBenito" Cc: Daniel J Walsh , Karl MacMillan , SE Linux Subject: Re: Latest diffs - Resent with additional changes. Message-ID: <20070219031951.GA9827@w-m-p.com> References: <45B8ACBF.8090201@redhat.com> <1171663101.20576.147.camel@sgc.columbia.tresys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1171663101.20576.147.camel@sgc.columbia.tresys.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:58:21PM -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 08:12 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > The MLS constraints are really screwed up. Need to come to some kind of > > agreement between you, klaus and tcs. > > I'm not familiar with the LSPP requirements, so its mainly up to Klaus > and the TCS guys to iron out what makes sense. I haven't heard back from TCS about their opinion on this. I would suggest using the constraints as in Dan's policy (and as used in the RHEL5 rc) since those are designed to meet LSPP requirements. Dan, if you need to change the MLS constraints for RHEL5 to be different from how they are now please let me know. -Klaus -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.