From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932654AbXBSUrQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:47:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932652AbXBSUrP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:47:15 -0500 Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([66.96.29.28]:60852 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932648AbXBSUrP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:47:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:47:03 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Zach Brown Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suparna bhattacharya , Andrew Morton , Leonid Ananiev Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event Message-ID: <20070219204703.GB31205@kvack.org> References: <20070219203527.20419.68418.sendpatchset@tetsuo.zabbo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070219203527.20419.68418.sendpatchset@tetsuo.zabbo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:35:27PM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event This patch has to be split in 2 to make it easier to review -- the change moving the event insertion code for the completion queue should stand separately, as it is completely unrelated to the rest of the patch. I *think* the patch is right, but picking the changes to the code and watching its movement at the same time is making my head spin. -ben -- "Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important." Don't Email: .