From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: PATA driver for Celleb Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:17:32 +0100 Message-ID: <200702200017.32924.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200701260724.l0Q7OISY027645@toshiba.co.jp> <1171920081.18571.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070219234651.4a19a912@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.191]:58011 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965524AbXBSXLa (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:11:30 -0500 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so601453muf for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:11:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070219234651.4a19a912@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Arnd Bergmann , Linas Vepstas , Jens Osterkamp , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton , James K Lewis On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:46, Alan wrote: > > > into one in drivers/ide but really want splitting for libata with some > > > kind of libata-pmac owning the shared stuff > > > > You meand driver/ide/ppc/pmac.c ? > > Yes > > > moving them out of the macio_asic to a PCI device at one point, so yes, > > maybe you are right, I should move the DMA bits to some "common" file > > and split the various implementations. > > I suspect it is worth doing when moving to libata at least, even if not > for the older driver. fully agreed, the way to go for both drivers Bart From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48300DDD0E for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:11:30 +1100 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so587439ugf for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:11:29 -0800 (PST) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: PATA driver for Celleb Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:17:32 +0100 References: <200701260724.l0Q7OISY027645@toshiba.co.jp> <1171920081.18571.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070219234651.4a19a912@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070219234651.4a19a912@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200702200017.32924.bzolnier@gmail.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton , James K Lewis List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:46, Alan wrote: > > > into one in drivers/ide but really want splitting for libata with some > > > kind of libata-pmac owning the shared stuff > > > > You meand driver/ide/ppc/pmac.c ? > > Yes > > > moving them out of the macio_asic to a PCI device at one point, so yes, > > maybe you are right, I should move the DMA bits to some "common" file > > and split the various implementations. > > I suspect it is worth doing when moving to libata at least, even if not > for the older driver. fully agreed, the way to go for both drivers Bart