From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965174AbXBTPuv (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:50:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965176AbXBTPuv (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:50:51 -0500 Received: from calculon.skynet.ie ([193.1.99.88]:52644 "EHLO calculon.skynet.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965174AbXBTPuu (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:50:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:50:47 +0000 To: Christoph Hellwig , Adam Litke , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Introduce the pagetable_operations and associated helper macros. Message-ID: <20070220155047.GA16142@skynet.ie> References: <20070219183123.27318.27319.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070219183133.27318.92920.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070219222906.GA16385@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070219222906.GA16385@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (19/02/07 22:29), Christoph Hellwig didst pronounce: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:31:34AM -0800, Adam Litke wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Adam Litke > > --- > > > > include/linux/mm.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > > index 2d2c08d..a2fa66d 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct { > > > > /* Function pointers to deal with this struct. */ > > struct vm_operations_struct * vm_ops; > > + struct pagetable_operations_struct * pagetable_ops; > > > > /* Information about our backing store: */ > > unsigned long vm_pgoff; /* Offset (within vm_file) in PAGE_SIZE > > @@ -218,6 +219,30 @@ struct vm_operations_struct { > > }; > > > > struct mmu_gather; > > + > > +struct pagetable_operations_struct { > > + int (*fault)(struct mm_struct *mm, > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned long address, int write_access); > > + int (*copy_vma)(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src, > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma); > > + int (*pin_pages)(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas, > > + unsigned long *position, int *length, int i); > > + void (*change_protection)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned long address, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot); > > + unsigned long (*unmap_page_range)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned long address, unsigned long end, long *zap_work); > > + void (*free_pgtable_range)(struct mmu_gather **tlb, > > + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > > + unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling); > > +}; > > I don't think adding another operation vector is a good idea. But I'd > rather extend the vma operations vector to deal with all nessecary > buts ubstead if addubg a second one. Well, there are a lot of users of vm_operations_struct that have no interest in the operations in pagetable_operations_struct. Expanding vm_operations_struct would increase the size of all VMAs by more than is necessary. Also, having the pagetable ops in vm_operations_struct might lead device drivers to believe they should be doing something entertaining there. In reality, we would only want drivers playing with pagetable_operations when they really know what they are doing and why. Having the pagetable_ops set is similar to VM_HUGETLB set as a strong sign that something unusual is going on that is fairly easy to check for. I prefer the additional struct to extending VMAs anyway. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:50:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Introduce the pagetable_operations and associated helper macros. Message-ID: <20070220155047.GA16142@skynet.ie> References: <20070219183123.27318.27319.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070219183133.27318.92920.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070219222906.GA16385@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070219222906.GA16385@infradead.org> From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Hellwig , Adam Litke , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (19/02/07 22:29), Christoph Hellwig didst pronounce: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:31:34AM -0800, Adam Litke wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Adam Litke > > --- > > > > include/linux/mm.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > > index 2d2c08d..a2fa66d 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct { > > > > /* Function pointers to deal with this struct. */ > > struct vm_operations_struct * vm_ops; > > + struct pagetable_operations_struct * pagetable_ops; > > > > /* Information about our backing store: */ > > unsigned long vm_pgoff; /* Offset (within vm_file) in PAGE_SIZE > > @@ -218,6 +219,30 @@ struct vm_operations_struct { > > }; > > > > struct mmu_gather; > > + > > +struct pagetable_operations_struct { > > + int (*fault)(struct mm_struct *mm, > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned long address, int write_access); > > + int (*copy_vma)(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src, > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma); > > + int (*pin_pages)(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas, > > + unsigned long *position, int *length, int i); > > + void (*change_protection)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned long address, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot); > > + unsigned long (*unmap_page_range)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned long address, unsigned long end, long *zap_work); > > + void (*free_pgtable_range)(struct mmu_gather **tlb, > > + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > > + unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling); > > +}; > > I don't think adding another operation vector is a good idea. But I'd > rather extend the vma operations vector to deal with all nessecary > buts ubstead if addubg a second one. Well, there are a lot of users of vm_operations_struct that have no interest in the operations in pagetable_operations_struct. Expanding vm_operations_struct would increase the size of all VMAs by more than is necessary. Also, having the pagetable ops in vm_operations_struct might lead device drivers to believe they should be doing something entertaining there. In reality, we would only want drivers playing with pagetable_operations when they really know what they are doing and why. Having the pagetable_ops set is similar to VM_HUGETLB set as a strong sign that something unusual is going on that is fairly easy to check for. I prefer the additional struct to extending VMAs anyway. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org