From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Subject: Re: Sata_via problems in a Vintage2-AE1: Resume Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:56:18 +0100 Message-ID: <200702211656.20120.lepalom@wol.es> References: <200702090010.06897.lepalom@wol.es> <200702151223.19333.lepalom@wol.es> <45DC3018.7010704@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from violet.upc.es ([147.83.2.51]:49206 "EHLO violet.upc.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161310AbXBUP4g convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:56:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45DC3018.7010704@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik A Dimecres 21 Febrer 2007 12:42, Tejun Heo va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 17:19, Jean Delvare va escriure: > >> Le Mardi 13 F=E9vrier 2007 17:11, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a =E9c= rit : > >>> A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 12:20, Jean Delvare va escriure: > >>> (...) > >>> > >>>>>> *If* the VT8251 needs the VIA IRQ quirk, then the attached pat= ch > >>>>>> may help. Leopold, can you give it a try? > >>>>> > >>>>> Well, making your patch to the vanilla 2.6.20 the result is the= same. > >>>>> The box doesn't boot. Always the same problem .... > >>>> > >>>> If it's not a VIA IRQ problem, then there's nothing more I can d= o, > >>>> sorry. Someone else will have to look into the problem. > >>>> > >>>> Out of curiosity, with my patch applied, did you see any "VIA VL= ink > >>>> IRQ fixup" messages on the console? > >>> > >>> No :-( > >> > >> OK, so maybe the VT8251 actually no longer needs the quirk. Thanks= for > >> testing and reporting. > > > > Hi people, > > > > arriving to this state. What do you recommend? > > > > I have the box more or less working with irqpoll but with a lot of > > messages: APIC error on CPU0: 08(08) > > > > and the box doesn't boot without the irqpoll option. Do you think t= hat > > the 2.6.21 have some kind of changes in this area? > > > > Thank's for all for you patience and your messages. > > I'm sorry but I'm clueless other than that it seems to be an irq rout= ing > problem. > > Any ideas, people? Now, I have tested the 2.6.21-rc1 with the same result. Not boot.... I have one doubt, and maybe Mr Garzik could answer it. The changes in t= he=20 ahci.c and sata_via.c for the 2.6.16 that I commented in a previous mai= ls are=20 incorporated in the next versions?=20 Because all of us has presumed that yes, are equal and maybe not ..... Regards, Thank's for all your patience .... Leo