Re: [stable] [patch 00/18] 2.6.18-stable review

From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
	stable@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 00/18] 2.6.18-stable review
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:30:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702212030.39807.caglar@pardus.org.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070221173445.GA16071@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1641 bytes --]

Hi;

21 Şub 2007 Çar tarihinde, Greg KH şunları yazmıştı: 
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:55:04PM +0200, S.??a??lar Onur wrote:
> > 21 ??ub 2007 ??ar tarihinde, Greg KH ??unlar?? yazm????t??:
> > > Responses should be made by Friday February 23 00:00 UTC.  Anything
> > > received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > We have still some CVEish patches in our package which maybe you want to
> > consider adding into -stable.
> >
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-4814
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5749
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5753
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5823
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6053
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6054
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6333
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-0006
>
> Do you have a pointer to the patches for these fixes anywhere?

http://svn.pardus.org.tr/pardus/2007/kernel/kernel/files/CVE/ has all of them 
as you can see some of them backports grabbed from newer kernels/git trees

> And are you sure they are all for 2.6.18?  The first one above is for
> the 2.4 kernel tree :)

Yep, but that one still clearly applies on top of 2.6.18.7. I'm not sure they 
have _valid cases_, i'm simply following the CVE announcements :)

Cheers
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]