From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752153AbXBWJZ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:25:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752151AbXBWJZ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:25:56 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56593 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752153AbXBWJZz (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:25:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:25:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070223.012519.48528691.davem@davemloft.net> To: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, kronos.it@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1172165959.25076.192.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1172159501.25076.182.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070222.092652.55507017.davem@davemloft.net> <1172165959.25076.192.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:39:19 +0100 > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 09:26 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > BTW, I'm adding support for sparc64, and before I get much further > > will the code handle a oneshot-only device? That's basically what I > > have (sparc64 basically has a TSC and a "comparison" register, you > > write the "comparison" register with the TSC value at which you'd like > > the timer interrupt to occur, so it's one-shot and you have to write > > it again to get the next timer). > > Yes, all you need is to omit the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC flag when you > register your device. Thanks a lot Thomas. I noticed while doing this work that the generic clock code is incompatible with the time interpolator, since both provide a do_{get,set}timeofday() implementation. Just FYI...