From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8085] New: performance drop in 2.6.20 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:20:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20070226072053.20573672.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org" , a1bert@atlas.cz To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:49301 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030276AbXBZPVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:21:55 -0500 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org ooh. Begin forwarded message: Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:10:48 -0800 From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: bugme-new@lists.osdl.org Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8085] New: performance drop in 2.6.20 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8085 Summary: performance drop in 2.6.20 Kernel Version: 2.6.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Owner: shemminger@osdl.org Submitter: a1bert@atlas.cz Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.19.5 Distribution: slackware based Hardware Environment: Xeon + e1000 Software Environment: gcc 3.3.x Problem Description: noticeable (10-15%) routing and bridging (possibly overall) performance drop between 2.6.19.5 - 2.6.20 (2.6.20.1 2.6.21-rc1 too) same configs we are experiencing performance drop on our rather busy(>150kpps >700Mbps in one direction) bridge with ebtables and routers (210k routes, >30kpps duplex). It's not e1000 issue. Steps to reproduce: ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.