From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [89.149.220.217] (helo=mail.kynisk.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HNsLn-0004OL-J4 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:10:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (54.84-48-194.nextgentel.com [84.48.194.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kynisk.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC9D1BF29C for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:10:15 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8yvind_Repvik?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:10:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45E77A73.5020800@protium.com> <1173019764.11398.143.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45EADF33.1060409@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: <45EADF33.1060409@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200703041610.02456.repvik@kynisk.com> Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev rootfs_ipk: as per OE, policy: remove feed management tools X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:10:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 04 March 2007 16:01, Koen Kooi wrote: > Matthias Hentges schreef: > > Am Sonntag, den 04.03.2007, 12:31 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > >> Assuming the above didn't break, what about this: > >> > >> 'bitbake package-index' will generate a deploy/bogofeed, everything el= se > >> stays as it is now. > > > > My reverted cset did exactly the above, it didn't even so much as touch > > your holy new ipk directory. > > But you put it in do_rootfs, where it doesn't belong. Well, why didn't you say that in the first place, instead of all this silly= =20 bickering? This argument has been extremely un-constructive, and the only=20 reason I can see for your arguments when they are all summed up is that you= =20 made a mistake and you're trying to cover your ass. Get over it already, mo= ve=20 it away from do_rootfs, but make it possible to choose. Regards, =D8yvind Repvik