From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Matthias Hahn Subject: Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:23:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20070306092339.GA3803@titan.lahn.de> References: <20070227135838.GA4328@titan.lahn.de> <45EB9822.40300@gmail.com> <20070305103840.GA4381@titan.lahn.de> <45EC3B3F.7020509@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ip-svs-1.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE ([134.106.12.126]:48335 "EHLO schlidder.svs.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030189AbXCFJXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:23:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EC3B3F.7020509@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Hello Tejun! On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:07AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > * Does applying the attached patch over unpatched 2.6.20.1 fix the problem? > > > > Yes, it seems to fix it. (testes on top of the first patch mentioned > > above, but witheout the second one.). > > If I should test it as the sole patche, just mail me again please. > > Yeap, please test it on top of vanilla kernel to verify that the patch > proper fixes the problem. Yes, applying only this patch does fix the problem. Thank you for your support. BYtE Philipp -- / / (_)__ __ ____ __ Philipp Hahn / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ pmhahn@titan.lahn.de