From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI? Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:18:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20070309071855.GA5148@ucw.cz> References: <20070302220454.a0c66d04.khali@linux-fr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:2521 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993061AbXCIHhL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:37:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: Jean Delvare , Matthew Garrett , Chuck Ebbert , Rudolf Marek , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Hi! > Port (and memory) addresses can be dynamically generated by the AML code > and thus, there is no way that the ACPI subsystem can statically predict > any addresses that will be accessed by the AML. Can you take this as a wishlist item? It would be nice if next version of acpi specs supported table 'AML / SMM BIOS will access these ports' ...so we can get it correct with acpi4 or something..? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:18:56 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI? Message-Id: <20070309071855.GA5148@ucw.cz> List-Id: References: <20070302220454.a0c66d04.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: Jean Delvare , Matthew Garrett , Chuck Ebbert , Rudolf Marek , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Hi! > Port (and memory) addresses can be dynamically generated by the AML code > and thus, there is no way that the ACPI subsystem can statically predict > any addresses that will be accessed by the AML. Can you take this as a wishlist item? It would be nice if next version of acpi specs supported table 'AML / SMM BIOS will access these ports' ...so we can get it correct with acpi4 or something..? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html