From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752285AbXCLXbP (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:31:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752311AbXCLXbO (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:31:14 -0400 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([213.145.232.33]:41340 "EHLO MAIL.13thfloor.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752284AbXCLXbO (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:31:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:31:13 +0100 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@sw.ru, pj@sgi.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, Paul Menage , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! Message-ID: <20070312233113.GD6832@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri , "Serge E. Hallyn" , ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@sw.ru, pj@sgi.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, Paul Menage , akpm@linux-foundation.org References: <20070307173031.GC2336@in.ibm.com> <20070307174346.GA19521@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070307180055.GC17151@in.ibm.com> <20070307205846.GB7010@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <6599ad830703071320ib687019h34d2e66c4abc3794@mail.gmail.com> <20070309163430.GN6504@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830703091409s3d233829gb8f0afbfd2883b15@mail.gmail.com> <20070312150756.GB24742@in.ibm.com> <20070312155643.GA12893@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070312162045.GD12176@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070312162045.GD12176@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:50:45PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > What's wrong with that? > > I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt > for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are > in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to > be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture > of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be > controlled. Is that correct? just means that the current Linux-VServer behaviour is a subset of that, no problem there as long as it really _is_ a subset :) we always like to provide more features in the future, no problem with that :) best, Herbert > > > echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks > > > > Adding that feature sounds fine, > > Ok yes ..that can be a optional feature. > > -- > Regards, > vatsa > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers@lists.osdl.org > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers