From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161035AbXCVLAO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:00:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161038AbXCVLAO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:00:14 -0400 Received: from mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.7.72]:39332 "EHLO mta-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161035AbXCVLAL (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:00:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:00:58 +0100 From: markus reichelt Subject: Re: max_loop limit In-reply-to: <460236CE.1030303@slax.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mail-followup-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <20070322110058.GB23664@tatooine.rebelbase.local> Organization: still stuck in reorganization mode MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: 0xC2A3FEE4 X-PGP-Fingerprint: FFB8 E22F D2BC 0488 3D56 F672 2CCC 933B C2A3 FEE4 X-Request-PGP: http://mareichelt.de/keys/c2a3fee4.asc References: <460236CE.1030303@slax.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Tomas M wrote: > I hope you will like it and you will include it in kernel. > Or, if not, maybe this patch will start some debate regarding > the current insufficient limit of 255 loop devices. 255 loop devices are insufficient? What kind of scenario do you have in mind? --=20 left blank, right bald --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGAmHqLMyTO8Kj/uQRAr23AKCS/IbZwz7ihnzNpGBHA6i5VvdstACfYzLr iadjvltnvBzgxFLLjIXbMeM= =4h92 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe--