From: linux@horizon.com
To: jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com, linux@horizon.com
Cc: htejun@gmail.com, jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20)
Date: 27 Mar 2007 12:58:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070327165802.13160.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703271242580.5965@p34.internal.lan>
> I meant you do not allocate the entire disk per raidset, which may alter
> performance numbers.
No, that would be silly. It does lower the average performance of the
large RAID-5 area, but I don't know how ext3fs is allocating the blocks
anyway, so
> 04:00.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
> I assume you mean 3132 right?
Yes; did I mistype?
02:00.0 Mass storage controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
03:00.0 Mass storage controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
04:00.0 Mass storage controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
> I also have 6 seagates, I'd need to run one
> of these tests on them as well, also you took the micro jumper off the
> Seagate 400s in the back as well right?
Um... no, I don't remember doing anything like that. What micro jumper?
It's been a while, but I just double-checked the drive manual and
it doesn't mention any jumpers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-27 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-27 16:16 Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20) linux
2007-03-27 16:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-27 16:41 ` linux
2007-03-27 16:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-27 16:58 ` linux [this message]
2007-03-27 17:03 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-28 14:42 ` Phillip Susi
2007-03-28 14:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-28 15:22 ` Andy Warner
2007-03-29 17:28 ` Phillip Susi
2007-03-29 18:40 ` linux
2007-03-29 18:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-29 21:35 ` Alan Cox
2007-03-29 21:47 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-30 16:33 ` Lennart Sorensen
[not found] <fa.NmF2xJwO4BeVbJrFRkf7oV9EYmQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.39luedDWsoqip+QMNtfAv8jvyNg@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.b1cZfpMNhZ0teK/UauKLDWw60Jc@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.xWaBy6HZTRTgI+PxinV8ajuOlJI@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.BiSx71HKysC9QIpS8DLip5BmfxI@ifi.uio.no>
2007-04-01 17:28 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] <fa.MhN9pBMjZID4rnTNn+fU01uZiss@ifi.uio.no>
2007-03-24 22:11 ` Robert Hancock
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-24 16:38 Justin Piszcz
2007-03-24 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2007-03-27 9:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-27 10:10 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-27 10:30 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-27 5:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-27 14:26 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-27 18:18 ` Mark Rustad
2007-03-27 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-27 22:12 ` Mark Rustad
2007-03-31 12:55 ` Ric Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070327165802.13160.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.