From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [1/4] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions (v2) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:01:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20070331150123.GU14134@stusta.de> References: <20070330213209.GM14134@stusta.de> <20070331002310.GA3213@ellpspace.math.ualberta.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070331002310.GA3213@ellpspace.math.ualberta.ca> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Jaegermann Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:23:10PM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:32:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Subject : kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller > > (ACPI/IRQ related) > > References : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229621 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/257 > > Submitter : Michal Jaegermann > > Status : unknown > > I have now even better one with pata_via. A kernel, which for > all practical purposes is 2.6.21-rc5, not only refuses to boot > (and I cannot find some option combination which would allow me to > do so anyway) but simply refuses to read _any_ data from a media. > This included a partitioning information. > > Earlier kernel on the same hardware boots without raising any fuss. > > Details are collected as > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234650 If I understand this correctly, a plain 2.6.20 kernel is already broken? > Michal cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed