From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:31:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070403093117.GA7747@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403000853.GF12295@wotan.suse.de>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > BTW, I will take a shot at ext4 tomorrow.
>
> Thanks, so long as you think ext3 is looking OK?
>
> BTW. is it a known issue that ext3 fails fsx-linux? (I tried 2.6.21-rc3
> IIRC, and ordered and writeback both eventually failed I think). ext2
> does not.
Well I just tested, and it is not fixed by the recent patch to revert
ext3_prepare_failure....
Is this a known issue? Is it an fsx-linux shortcoming? It is fairly
surprising because it basically makes it impossible to test ext3
changes with that nice tool :( I can submit the traces if anyone is
interested, however I can reproduce in UML on an ext3 writeback
filesystem with no arguments (except the filename).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-02 12:09 [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 20:18 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 20:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 15:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 21:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:08 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:14 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 15:57 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 23:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 23:56 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 0:00 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:08 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 9:31 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-04-03 16:03 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 3:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04 22:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 22:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 22:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 23:02 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 23:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 23:17 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 23:32 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-05 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 15:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-06 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 0:10 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-05 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 2:43 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 3:00 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 6:18 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 6:40 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070403093117.GA7747@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=pbadari@gmail.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.