From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992838AbXDDKh2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:37:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992839AbXDDKh1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:37:27 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:51998 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992838AbXDDKh1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:37:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:36:24 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ego@in.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@in.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov , dipankar@in.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, Roland McGrath Subject: Re: utrace merge Message-ID: <20070404103624.GA509@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ego@in.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@in.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov , dipankar@in.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, Roland McGrath References: <20070402053457.GA9076@in.ibm.com> <20070402061612.GA7072@elte.hu> <20070403120104.GB29308@in.ibm.com> <200704032134.29720.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070403132427.88308b59.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070404100644.GC19120@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070404100644.GC19120@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:06:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > urgh, I screwed up, sorry. > > > > utrace-prep-2 reverts a bit of the underlying tree so that the utrace > > patches (which are against mainline) don't throw a tremendous reject > > which has to be fixed each time I pull Roland's tree. I'm supposed to > > reapply that change after the utrace patches but forgot. > > btw., how about pushing utrace to v2.6.22, is anything big holding that > up? (other than Roland's modesty, which we should gently but firmly > ignore in this case =B-) a) lots of architecture support b) lots of overengineered and obsfucated code c) missing public information I've also not gotten any feedback to my ages old review and the issues don't seem to be addressed either.