From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S2992893AbXDDMY3@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S2992893AbXDDMY3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:24:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992894AbXDDMY3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:24:29 -0400
Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:32855 "EHLO
	e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S2992893AbXDDMY2 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:24:28 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:54:25 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       paulmck@us.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
       "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, dipankar@in.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com,
       masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cpu-hotplug: Using the Process Freezer (try2)
Message-ID: <20070404122425.GB14825@in.ibm.com>
Reply-To: ego@in.ibm.com
References: <20070402092818.GE2456@in.ibm.com> <20070402111828.GA14771@elte.hu> <20070402124200.GA9566@in.ibm.com> <20070402185607.GA2081@elte.hu> <20070403125619.GA32444@in.ibm.com> <20070403141516.GB14900@in.ibm.com> <20070404031502.GA23591@in.ibm.com> <20070404100431.GB19120@elte.hu> <20070404104123.GA14825@in.ibm.com> <20070404114901.GA8261@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070404114901.GA8261@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:49:01PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> i suspect a fork-intensive application like kernbench should be close to 
> the worst-case already. A more IO-intensive workload would maximize the 
> uninterruptible-sleep latencies perhaps?

Ok. I hope the NFS read/write in a tight loop should do the trick.
Will get back soon.

> 
> 	Ingo

Thanks and Regards
gautham.
-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"