From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:10:18 +1000 Message-ID: <20070405001018.GK32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20070402120934.GA19626@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Filesystems , Mark Fasheh , Steven Whitehouse To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:33473 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932079AbXDEAKy (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:10:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070402120934.GA19626@wotan.suse.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > Updated aops patchset against 2.6.21-rc5. > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/patches/new-aops/ > > Files/dirs are 2.6.21-rc5-new-aops* > > Contains numerous fixes from Mark and myself -- I'd say the core code is > getting reasonably stable at this point. ...... > (compile only) patches for NFS, XFS, FUSE, eCryptfs. OK, they're untested, Failed to compile in UDF and reiser for me, but no doubt you know that already. Don't have time to look at why - I just disabled them so I get some QA done on the XFS and core changes. On a related note - what's the rules for a perform_write() implementation? I noticed that wasn't documented with write_begin and write_end and I don't see any other filesystem implementing it yet.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group