From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965927AbXDEJxK (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 05:53:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752691AbXDEJxK (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 05:53:10 -0400 Received: from mail.screens.ru ([213.234.233.54]:43467 "EHLO mail.screens.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752550AbXDEJxJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 05:53:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:53:01 +0400 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Gautham R Shenoy Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@in.ibm.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Make process freezer reentrant Message-ID: <20070405095301.GB609@tv-sign.ru> References: <20070402053457.GA9076@in.ibm.com> <20070402053741.GB12962@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070402053741.GB12962@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/02, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > > int freeze_processes(unsigned long freeze_event) > { > unsigned int nr_unfrozen; > - > + int ret = 0; > + mutex_lock(&freezer_mutex); > + if (system_freeze_event_mask & freeze_event) > + goto done; I am not sure this is correct. Suppose that system_freeze_event_mask == FE_SUSPEND, now freeze_processes(FE_ALL) returns success. Shouldn't we return an error? Oleg.