From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FDFDDE3F for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:48:27 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:48:21 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Christian Krafft Subject: Re: [patch] ipmi: check, if default ports are accessible on PPC Message-ID: <20070420174821.GA4176@aepfle.de> References: <1172223703.4695.59.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070223135859.62e19ca8@localhost> <1172295412.16060.8.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070226160917.2c801ec7@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20070226160917.2c801ec7@localhost> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , "openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Feb 26, Christian Krafft wrote: > ipmi_si_intf tries to access default ports, if no device could > be found elsewhere. On PPC we have a function to check, > if these legacy IO ports are accessible. This patch adds > a check for these ports on PPC. > This patch fixes a breakage of IPMI module > on PPC machines without a BMC. This patch is a no-op even for IPMI capable systems. None of the platform check_legacy_ioport() functions check for port number 0xca2, 0xca9 or 0xe4. What exactly did you test? Appearently not Linus tree.