From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:12:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20070425221204.GG30061@steel.home> References: <20070425200718.GB30061@steel.home> <7vzm4wupew.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 26 00:12:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hgpig-0006cV-RF for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:12:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754483AbXDYWMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:12:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754492AbXDYWMI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:12:08 -0400 Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.188]:57653 "EHLO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754483AbXDYWMH (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:12:07 -0400 Received: from tigra.home (Fac4b.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.172.75]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo31) (RZmta 5.6) with ESMTP id A0357bj3PHPN4e ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:12:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF614277BD; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by steel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24B23BDDE; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vzm4wupew.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-RZG-AUTH: z4gQVF2k5XWuW3CculzzcFqtlg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, Wed, Apr 25, 2007 23:15:03 +0200: > Is this really necessary? > > I would rather want to leave some tests use "git merge" while > some others use "git pull ." to catch breakage of either form. > No, of course not. I think the last patch should apply anyway. I didn't realize these were the last uses of the old git-pull syntax