From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix queue] aec62xx: kill speedproc() method wrapper Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <200705152343.12956.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200702032309.43867.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200702162321.40813.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705120122.34384.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:35755 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760543AbXEPAqa (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2007 20:46:30 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so2836uga for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 17:46:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200705120122.34384.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Friday 11 May 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite > different chip families, so just get rid of it. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov applied