From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762198AbXE1LKG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 07:10:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750710AbXE1LJ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 07:09:57 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:47895 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783AbXE1LJ4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 07:09:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:44 +0530 From: Vivek Goyal To: Andi Kleen , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header. Message-ID: <20070528110944.GE32045@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com References: <200704301717.08230.ak@suse.de> <20070501035539.GA15472@in.ibm.com> <20070501050657.GA23111@in.ibm.com> <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Vivek Goyal [2007-05-01 07:06]: > > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a > > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there. > > What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you > didn't merge it? Did someone file a GDB bug? > I had sent a mail to gdb mailing list but no response. Did not raise a bug though. Thanks Vivek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Hsd6q-0003Ce-4A for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 07:09:57 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4SB9sgN013310 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 07:09:54 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l4SB9sp4532238 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 07:09:54 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l4SB9slw014531 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 07:09:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:44 +0530 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header. Message-ID: <20070528110944.GE32045@in.ibm.com> References: <200704301717.08230.ak@suse.de> <20070501035539.GA15472@in.ibm.com> <20070501050657.GA23111@in.ibm.com> <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andi Kleen , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bernhard Walle On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Vivek Goyal [2007-05-01 07:06]: > > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a > > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there. > > What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you > didn't merge it? Did someone file a GDB bug? > I had sent a mail to gdb mailing list but no response. Did not raise a bug though. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec