From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:18:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from NaN.false.org ([208.75.86.248]:9348 "EHLO nan.false.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20023865AbXHIPSR (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:18:17 +0100 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FA2982CE; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0F6982C5; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:18:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IJ9m8-00029E-Is; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:18:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:18:12 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Franck Bui-Huu Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove '-mno-explicit-relocs' option when CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 Message-ID: <20070809151812.GA28142@caradoc.them.org> References: <11715446603241-git-send-email-fbuihuu@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11715446603241-git-send-email-fbuihuu@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 16153 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: dan@debian.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:04:18PM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > From: Franck Bui-Huu > > This patch removes '-mno-explicit-relocs' usage when > CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is set since this option was only required > with the old hack to truncate addresses at the assembly level > where "-mabi=64 -Wa,-mabi=32" was used. > > This should yield a small code size improvement for inline > assembly, where the R constraint is used. > > The idea is coming from Maciej . It looks like nothing ever came of these patches? I tried to boot my Sentosa again today, and needed a slightly updated version of them. I'm not positive I did the update correctly, though, since the board panics in swapper after jumping to a bogus pointer. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery