From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maximilian Wilhelm Subject: Re: Netfilter List cross-subscription [Re: Test] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:06:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20070917170649.GA26915@outback.rfc2324.org> References: <46EE6679.3000103@trash.net> <46EE6956.10608@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46EE6956.10608@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Am Monday, den 17 September hub Patrick McHardy folgendes in die Tasten: > Patrick McHardy wrote: > > netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, please ignore > The cross-subscription appears to work, unfortunately (due to the > subscriber-only posting settings of the old list) senders to the > new lists that are not subscribed to the old one will receive a > "held for moderator approval" mail for each post. Since this is > probably quite annoying for everyone, I'm not sure whether we > should really do the cross-subscription thing. > Any better ideas or suggestions? Did I get this right, that the old and the new list will be run in parallel for a while and this will probably make trouble? # define Hackvalue 42 What about moving all subscriptions to the new list and forward the old address to the new one? Ciao Max -- Follow the white penguin.