From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.68.91.202] (helo=xora.org.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IfDgI-0000kf-TV for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:55:22 +0200 Received: from aquilonia ([::ffff:62.220.14.162]) (AUTH: LOGIN dp, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by xora.org.uk with esmtp; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:49:35 +0100 id 00064059.470B6ACF.000054E2 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:49:29 +0200 From: Graeme Gregory To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20071009134929.0ebdf0ce@aquilonia> In-Reply-To: <20071009131812.0f55c4d2@aquilonia> References: <1191494488.2516.34.camel@toontown> <1191502502.2516.39.camel@toontown> <4704F01B.70104@klever.net> <4705D99D.6070209@miromico.ch> <1191918523.470b3bbb10a47@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <74d0deb30710090202i61cdd25n22f3519ebfd9147a@mail.gmail.com> <1191926182.20582.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071009131812.0f55c4d2@aquilonia> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oe for two target boards at the same time X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:55:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:18:12 +0200 Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:36:22 +0200 > Richard Purdie wrote: > > The issue should be fixed. I regularly make builds with a MACHINE ?= > > entry but with MACHINE set in the environment too and it all seems > > to work. > > > > People keep telling me there is a problem but I've not seen any > > reproducible test case... > > > > NOTE: package binutils-cross-2.18-r0: task do_populate_staging: > completed > > looks fixed to me, I never used to be able to do this. > Spoke too soon checking for libc-friendly stddef.h... yes checking whether we need to use -P to assemble .S files... no checking whether .text pseudo-op must be used... yes checking for assembler global-symbol directive... .globl checking for .set assembler directive... no checking for assembler .type directive prefix... % checking for .symver assembler directive... yes checking for ld --version-script... no *** WARNING: You should not compile GNU libc without versioning. Not using *** versioning will introduce incompatibilities so that old binaries *** will not run anymore. *** For versioning you need recent binutils (binutils-2.8.1.0.23 or newer). checking for .previous assembler directive... yes checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... yes checking for broken __attribute__((visibility()))... no checking for broken __attribute__((alias()))... no checking whether to put _rtld_local into .sdata section... no checking for arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-readelf... arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-re adelf checking for .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support... no configure: error: Need linker with .init_array/.fini_array support. FATAL: oe_runconf failed This is what happens if MACHINE=spitz bitbake angstrom-devel-image Graeme