From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9155] New: No fan control with ATI Radeon display support on HP nx6125. Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:53:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20071013105315.accef6aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:35048 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756843AbXJMRxd (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:53:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, daniel.wuerfel@gmx.net On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:37:35 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9155 > > Summary: No fan control with ATI Radeon display support on HP > nx6125. > Product: Drivers > Version: 2.5 > KernelVersion: 2.6.22, 2.6.23 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: low > Priority: P1 > Component: Video(Other) > AssignedTo: drivers_video-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > ReportedBy: daniel.wuerfel@gmx.net > > > Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur:2.6.21 > Distribution:gentoo > Hardware Environment:HP nx6125 BIOS version F.11 > Software Environment:Gnome 2.18, ati-driver 8.40.4 > Problem Description:If you enable "support for frame buffer devices", "Vesa vga > graphics support" and "ati radeon display support" under "graphics support" so > you lost fan cantrol on your hp nx6125, that means the fan doens't stop > working. > > Steps to reproduce:Enable "support for frame buffer devices", "Vesa vga > graphics support" and "ati radeon display support" under "graphics support" on > your hp nx6125 and after the next boot the fan will not switched off. > Does anyone know whether this is likely to be a radeon driver bug or an acpi bug or something else??