From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753363AbXLEDKT (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:10:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751270AbXLEDKF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:10:05 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:60064 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750944AbXLEDKC (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:10:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 19:09:23 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Paulo Marques Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] kallsyms should prefer non weak symbols Message-Id: <20071204190923.f5037693.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4755BA14.8060706@grupopie.com> References: <4755BA14.8060706@grupopie.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:35:32 +0000 Paulo Marques wrote: > When resolving symbol names from addresses with aliased symbol names, > kallsyms_lookup always returns the first symbol, even if it is a weak > symbol. > > This patch changes this by sorting the symbols with the weak symbols > last before feeding them to the kernel. This way the kernel runtime > isn't changed at all, only the kallsyms build system is changed. > > Another side effect is that the symbols get sorted by address, too. So, > even if future binutils version have some bug in "nm" that makes it fail > to correctly sort symbols by address, the kernel won't be affected by this. > > > From: Paulo Marques > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers The signoffs don't make sense. If you authored the patch then please put a From: at the top of the changelog and include your signed-off-by:. If Mathieu worked on or forwarded the patch then include his s-o-b. If he wasn't in the delivery path but has tested/reviewed/approved the patch then Acked-by: is more appropriate. Documentation/SubmittingPatches has details...